What Happens Now?

When a Rule Making Petition is filed with the FCC (as ours has been), the Commission first decides whether it has merit and is worth pursuing.

If the Commission decides the issue merits attention, it assigns an RM number to the petition. It also establishes periods of time when comments and reply comments may be filed.

After that the FCC begins actual consideration of the issue, in light of the comments received. The whole process will certainly take months and may take years.

At present, we are awaiting an RM number.

We may start asking supporters to contact the FCC and ask elected officials to contact the FCC in support of getting the number issued.

If you are signed up to receive updates from this site or our e-mail blasts you will be the first to know when we need supporters to take action.

We are fortunate that Tom, N5GAR, has previous experience sheparding a Petition to successful rulemaking and is guiding our effort.

Support this Site
Support N5FDL.com with a donation.

« 97.113 Waivers Extremely Limited, Alas | Main | 97.113 Petition Update »
Wednesday
21Oct2009

97.113 Waivers Are Not Enough

I was encouraged to see that the FCC will be considering waiver requests from government organizations (only) that wish to hold events that would otherwise violate 97.113 because of employee participation. This is an improvement in the current mess—or may be—but it depends on the details.

For example, the Public Notice (below) seems to describe “one-up” events only. I have requested a decision on whether ongoing events, such as a weekly net, will also be granted waivers. I will report back as soon as I hear for the FCC on this important issue.

A cumbersome waiver process does not substitute for a new rule that permits participating in emergency training by professional responders who are also licensed amateurs.

It is also interesting to note that the Public Notice was issued a week after our petition was received by the Commission. We wanted to wait until we received our receipt back from Washington before posting the petition online. I expect to do that over the weekend.

Here is the public notice:

 

PUBLIC NOTICE
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th St., S.W. Washington DC 20554
News Media Information: 202-418-0500
Internet: http://www.fcc.gov
TTY:  1-888-835-5322

DA 09-2259

Released:  October 20, 2009

AMATEUR SERVICE COMMUNICATIONS DURING GOVERNMENT DISASTER DRILLS

Transmissions by amateur stations participating in government disaster drills must comply with all applicable amateur service rules.  While the value of the amateur service to the public as a voluntary noncommercial communications service, particularly with respect to providing emergency communications, is one of the underlying principles of the amateur service [1],  the amateur service is not an emergency radio service.  Rather, it is a voluntary, non-commercial communication service authorized for the purpose of self-training, intercommunication and technical investigations carried out by licensed persons interested in radio technique solely with a personal aim and without pecuniary interest.[2]

State and local government public safety agencies occasionally conduct emergency preparedness or disaster drills that include amateur operations.  Some entities, such as hospitals, emergency operations centers, and police, fire, and emergency medical service stations, have expressed interest in having their employees who are amateur station operators participate in these drills by transmitting messages on the entity’s behalf.  The Commission’s Rules, however, specifically prohibit amateur stations from transmitting communications “in which the station licensee or control operator has a pecuniary interest, <add emphasis> including communications on behalf of an employer.</end
emphasis>” [3]

Given the public interest in facilitating government-sponsored emergency preparedness and disaster drills, we take this opportunity to provide a clear process for requesting a waiver, and the information that we require in order to consider granting such a
request.[4]   Waiver requests should be submitted to the Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau by the government entity conducting the drill, and must provide the following information:  (1) when and where the drill will take place; (2) identification of the amateur licensees expected to transmit amateur communications on behalf of their employers; (3) identification of the employers on whose behalf they will be transmitting; and (4) a brief description of the drill. We emphasize that the filing of a waiver request does not excuse compliance with the rules while that request is pending.  The waiver must be requested prior to the drill, and employees may not transmit amateur communications on their employer’s behalf unless the waiver request has been granted.

In an actual emergency, the Commission’s Rules provide that an amateur station may use any means of radiocommunication at its disposal to provide essential communication needs in connection with the immediate safety of human life and the immediate protection of property when
normal communication systems are not available.[5]   In those
circumstances, rule waiver is not necessary.

For further information regarding matters discussed in this Public Notice, contact William T. Cross of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Mobility Division, at (202) 418-0680, William.Cross@fcc.gov.

By the Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau; Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau; and Chief, Enforcement Bureau.

-FCC-

Footnotes:

[1] See 47 C.F.R. § 97.1(a).  See also Recommendations of the Independent Panel Reviewing the Impact of Hurricane Katrina on Communications Networks, Order, EB Docket No. 06-119; WC Docket No.
06-63, 22 FCC Rcd 10541, 10576  111 (2007) (noting that the amateur radio community played an important role in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina and other disasters).

[2] See 47 C.F.R. § 97.3(a)(4).

[3] See 47 C.F.R. § 97.113(a)(3) (emphasis added).

[4] See 47 C.F.R. § 1.925.

[5] See 47 C.F.R. § 97.403.  See also Amendment of Part 97 of the Commission’s Rules Governing the Amateur Radio Services, Report and Order, WT Docket No. 04-140, 21 FCC 11643, 11667  52 (2006) (clarifying that amateur radio operators who are emergency personnel may use their amateur radio stations while in paid duty status, but not addressing the prohibition against transmitting messages on behalf of an employer).

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (4)

Dear Committee for Screwing Up Amateur Radio,

Amateur Radio is NOT meant to be an auxiliary service for emergency services, it is a hobby for people that LIKE radio. I notice this attempt by people that have businesses that will benefit financially if the petition pass.
I have only had my license a few months, at first all these wackers that are drawn to HAM radio amused me, but, a huge but....
These people have no interest in ham radio, but love driving cars with semi official decals, an antenna farm on the roof and emergency lights... Wannabe LEO's...

Amateur Radio is a fun and challenging technical hobby, UNLESS the President of the US have declared an emergency, and then I will be happy to surrender my services.

There is NO need for changes to part 97.11
Emergency response units, either it is fire, Police, medical or others have their communications systems that have been paid for with billions of dollars by taxpayers. If that is not enough, I would like to as a taxpayer to know where my tax money went.
This is a pathetic attempt for some people to boost their business on the cost of the Amateur Radio community.

October 25, 2009 | Registered CommenterLeif Stensrud

I respectfully disagree with Mr. Stensrud’s assessment of the need for 97.113 waiver. With 15 years of experiences as an emergency planner and a first responder in a county of 675,000 residents and seven acute care hospitals I believe the waiver is desperately needed.

Our county devotes approximately 1.5 million of Homeland Security grant funds annually towards improving interoperable communications each year, with the ultimate goal of full implementation of a 32 million dollar master communications plan. In addition, the Emergency Medical Services Agency recently implemented a 500K upgrade to a 30 year old Medical Network communications system, designed for field paramedic to hospital communications. Other healthcare communications are provided through two web based applications known as EMSystem and the California Health Alert Network (CAHAN). Regardless of how much money is spent of the latest communications technology all these systems are vulnerable and can fail during a disaster.

The horror stories from hospitals devastated by Hurricane Katrina is all the proof anyone in the country needs. Many hospitals were 100% on there own for days without communications, running water, and other utilities. No law enforcement, fire, or EMS assistance from the government. All they had were the staff on duty at the time of the disaster. One of the lessons learned from this event should make it very clear to anyone who is responsible for the safety of patients, visitors, or staff of any hospital anywhere in the United States, is all public safety and communications infrastructure can fail. Hospital staff must be self sufficient at times of disaster, including achieving and maintaining a level of operational competency with the use of amateur radio. This level of preparedness cannot be achieved without routine training, practice and testing, which is currently illegal.

97.113 impedes the ability of hospitals in the United States from achieving an acceptable level of disaster preparedness. Think about it, you could be the next person left to die in an unprepared hospital. Amateur radio is intended to be used when all else fails; however it won’t work unless the microphone is in the hands of a trained operator. Let’s work together to make sure that a repeat of Hurricane Katina type failures doesn’t happen again by supporting this waiver.

October 26, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterPhil Cook, KI6OAG

I may change my stand on this...

I think the right thing is to support this amendment but the conditions for these professional licensees need to be worked out.
We know that few if any of these professionals will have any interest in amateur radio. For that reason FCC should demand a certain level of training and maintenance of their general radio operation skills. The last thing we need in an eventual disaster is is a bunch of people yapping on a radio they can not operate sufficiently. Beside general ham operations, like checking into nets, they should every year have to pass a test that they actually are proficient in operating their equipment, trouble shoot and make adjustments to get the most out of their equipment.
So I think at least 4 hour general ham operation a week should be demanded, monitored by FCC, and since we are talking about professionals here, they should pay for their license, and pay enough to cover special FCC inspectors to monitor that they are actually following the special regulations.

This again should be monitored by FCC, financed with special license fee.
I would think that each license should cost in the range of $300/year.

We are talking about that these people are supposed to provide professional service in a possible disaster/emergency so they better be prepared.....

October 26, 2009 | Registered CommenterLeif Stensrud

Just for the record...
With 4 hour practice a week, I suggest the same as Norwegian Police officers, that do not carry guns are required to each week on the shooting range.
That should be equally comparable.

October 26, 2009 | Registered CommenterLeif Stensrud
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.